The Saga of Paul Hill



I'd not been too familiar with Paul's story until he went on trial.
 
The event in question  occurred in 1994  when I wasn't  paying much
attention to what was happening in the pro-life movement. I vaguely
remembered reading something about it several years ago,  that left
me  with the impression  Paul might have other,  personal problems,
too.  And  I didn't want to  get involved  in something that wasn't
purely abortion related.                                           
 
The regular media didn't given it much attention;  and,  strangely,
neither did my pro-life news sources. But, in the end, it came down
to Paul  conducting himself well  when he was executed  for gunning
down a Pensacola,  Florida,  abortion purveyor  and his  bodyguard.
Now, here's some of the reaction to that event:                    
 
Larry Spalding, an ACLU lawyer, had this to say: "There are crazies
in the anti-abortion movement  who are susceptible  to this type of
message,  that in order to save the unborn  it is necessary to kill
doctors." Excuse me for interrupting Larry's story, but the crazies
are really the handful of abortion doctors  who slaughter approxim-
ately 3300 children a day,  in this country alone, for profit,  and
pump  some of that money,  as a cost  of doing business,  back into
organizations like Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Feder-
ation, the ACLU, and to buy politicians to keep abortion legal; and
people like Larry without moral principles,  who've been duped into
helping them run this scam. What this is really about is protecting
a very profitable industry - the multi-billion dollar  abortion in-
dustry.                                                            
 
"His actions set the pro-life movement back years and made pro-life
people who believe killing is the wrong answer  to a difficult sit-
uation look like hypocrites.  Joe Scheidler,  director of the  Pro-
Life Action League,  says  no more than a handful  of people out of
millions of pro-life advocates  believe Hill  is a hero  because of
what  he did.  'We see the babies  as martyrs,  but not Paul Hill,'
Scheidler said." Steven Ertelt LifeNews.com Editor August 20, 2003.
 
You're right,  Steve,  pro-life people do look like hypocrites. But
you've bought into  the politically correct  liberal argument as to
why.  Well spoken Joe.  Joe has saved a lot of lives  from abortion
over the past  30+ years;  but one at a time.  And I can understand
his nonviolent  perspective  since  one of  his main  activities is
peaceful pro-life demonstrations.  But the reason abortion is still
around  today  is reflected  in these  two attitudes.  They believe
 abortion is morally wrong, and see all the harm and grief it causes.
What they  seemingly don't grasp  or fully appreciate  is that  the
person being killed by an abortion  is just as much a person as the
abortionist  doing the killing  -  with just as much right to go on
living. They've been lulled into the "fetus" mentality.  Joe should
take a minute  to reflect,  look at  one of  his  abortion pictures
again,  and ask himself what what sees,  and if it is any different
from one of his own children, or what was done to it any less of an
outrage.  Just because a baby is inside its mother  doesn't make it
any less a person than one on the outside.                         
 
Because  I'm one  of that  "handful"  he spoke of, and I think that
statement sends the wrong message  -  that you don't really believe
that the child being aborted is an actual person  -  and that hurts
the pro-life movement even more than Paul's double murder,  because
we're supposed to lead and not be victims of the popular culture.  
 
I read a statement by a clergyman, who I thought expressed it best,
 that to think otherwise is to be "inconsistent", and many pro-lifers
have been lured into the logical trap of wanting to not appear pro-
violence while ignoring the horrific violence in the womb.         
 
Joe  devoted  almost half a page  in his Fall 2003  Action News  to
eloquently arguing  that homicide  is not morally justifiable.  But
like  Fr. Pavone  below,  he leads with the conclusion  he wants to
make,  and his arguments end up proving the opposite for anyone who
objectively analyzes them.                                         
 
My government  spent 4 months  eagerly preparing and training me to
kill,  then took  four years  out of  my life  and sent me  halfway
around the world,  so I would be there ready to kill to protect the
lives of people  back home,  from the likes  of Osama Bin Laden and
 the attack on Pearl Harbor. What Paul Hill did was no different than
that - defending the lives of his countrymen  because he understood
it was his duty to do so.  He made that ultimate sacrifice, so that
others could live, just as our troops continue to do in Afghanistan
today.                                                             
 
"'What  he did  is definitely  not anything  that anyone  I know of
supports."  Tom Glessner,  director of  the  National Institute  of
Family and Life Advocates,  said Hill  deserves  the death penalty.
'He's not  a pro-lifer,  as far as  I'm concerned,'  Glessner said.
'Osama bin Laden acted out of conviction, too.'"  Washington Times,
STARKE, Fla., Sept. 3 (UPI)  Now you know of someone, Tom. You just
desecrated  the memory of a fallen comrade and hero.  I suggest you
 direct yourself into a different line of work, since you seem unable
to determine which side you are on.                                
 
"Obviously, some people are trying to make Paul Hill out to be some
kind of martyr.  He's not;  he's a murderer  who deserves  whatever
punishment the state deems appropriate."  American Life League Vice
President Jim Sedlak                                               
 
I can't help but be angered by your statement,  Jim.  Just stick to
shutting down abortion clinics in the future.  Are you on vacation,
Judie Brown?                                                       
 
"Father Frank Pavone  of Priests for Life  tells LifeNews.com  that
Hill's actions also were not Biblical.  'Scripture, particularly in
the writings of John,  teaches that  we love one another  by laying
down our own lives, not by laying down the lives of others,' Pavone
explains."  Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Report,  Thursday, September
4, 2003                                                            
 
That's exactly what Paul Hill did, Father Pavone,  he laid down his
life for the 32 children  scheduled to be murdered that day.  Where
would the Israelites have been if David hadn't stepped up and slain
the Philistine?  Perhaps  you should go back  to the Seminary for a
Bible refresher.                                                   
 
Because Paul Hill was abandoned by major pro-life organizations, he
was executed. Perhaps saddest of all, none of the truly fine public
interest law firms  that protect  pro-life advocates  and activists
 stepped forward to take his part. I can sort of understand Jeb Bush,
and George Bush, not acting,  when not confronted by any real pres-
sure to do so.  If we  don't provide  the conviction  we can hardly
fault our politicians  for following their political advice.  But I
believe that someday  they will regret not having acted.  He didn't
have to be set free - just preserved until the day he could be.    
 
But I do feel that John Ashcroft did not live up to my expectations
for him  when he took office.  Once again,  does power and personal
gain  overshadow decisions  with rationalizations,  even for a very
religious man? As we have just seen, the rule of law can be carried
to the point  where injustice  is inevitably done.  Praying in your
office  isn't going to offset  the fact  that you failed to act  in
defense of life.                                                   
 
I don't advocate  doing what  Paul Hill did,  as I explained  in my
lengthy write-up on James Kopp.  If you haven't read it, you can do
so in my book: Abortion ! Pros and Cons. For one thing I agree that
it is counter-productive. I just believe that it is morally justif-
iable. To give your life to save those of others should get a medal
- not an execution.  In the Marines,  if  you were  a Congressional
Medal of Honor winner,  it was no longer necessary  for an enlisted
man to even salute an officer. They honored you - not vice versa.  
 
But there are people who go even further than my position:         
 
"Pro-Lifers Clash Over Paul Hill: Martyr or Murderer               
 
(CNSNews.com)  -  The spiritual adviser  to convicted murderer Paul
Hill,  who killed  an abortionist  and a clinic escort,  criticized
pro-life  organizations  for  their  unwillingness  to support  the
former Presbyterian minister as he awaited a Wednesday execution.  
 
The  Rev. Donald Spitz,  who has  met  daily  with Hill,  said many
people  in the pro-life movement  consider Hill  a hero for killing
abortionist  John Britton  and  his  escort,  James Barrett,  at an
abortion clinic in Pensacola, Fla., on July 29, 1994.              
 
Spitz said Hill would become a martyr  when Florida executes him by
lethal injection Wednesday. As director of Pro-Life Virginia, Spitz
has long been  an advocate  for using force  to stop abortions.  He
chided  groups  that call themselves  pro-life  but don't share his
views.                                                             
 
 'They're absolute hypocrites,' Spitz said. 'If an abortionist walked
 into their house and was going to murder their children, they're not
going to take a human life  to protect their own children?  I think
they would.  Yet they don't feel  the lives of those 32 babies were
worth protecting.                                                  
 
'They prefer  dead babies  to the dead abortionist.  If you have to
choose  between live babies  or a live abortionist,  I'd choose the
live babies.  They choose dead babies  and a live abortionist,'  he
added.  'They seem to have a total disregard for the babies they're
trying to protect.'                                                
 
Spitz  contends  that Hill's actions  saved the lives  of 32 unborn
babies  who would have been aborted  on the day  he carried out the
murder.                                                            
 
Spitz, for instance, said the Bible contains multiple references to
protecting  the innocent.  He said  it's completely  justifiable to
intervene when someone's life is at stake.                         
 
Hill has other defenders  as well,  including the Rev. Michael Bray
of Bowie, Md.,  who has written  a book  justifying  the murder  of
 abortionists." By: Robert B. Bluey Source: CNSNews.com Publish Date:
 September 03, 2003 Online at: http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?
age=/Nation/archive/200309/NAT20030903a.html                     
 
So what our legal system is telling us is that it was allowable for
John Britton to kill 32 people a day,  but a crime for Paul Hill to
kill him to stop it  -  because the government wouldn't do anything
about it.  Everybody is just supposed to ignore those 32 people per
day, and pretend it wasn't really happening? So to kill people, you
just  have to manipulate  the law to your advantage.  Like in Nazis
Germany where they passed laws designating Jews  as non-persons. Of
course  the 6,000,000 Jews killed by the Nazis  can't come close to
the 45,000,000 people we've exterminated  in this country since Roe
v. Wade in 1973.                                                   
 
What kind of justice  is this,  that allows people  innocent of any
crime to be executed by the millions, but protects the killers, and
then additionally executes those defending the defenseless? This is
clearly not justice, or a justice system that is working.          
 
Charlie Daniels asks the right question in his book  "Ain't No Rag:
Freedom, Family, and the Flag".  "Why do we stand so firmly against
giving the death sentence to some wanton killer  and not say a word
about the death sentence  given to innocent unborn babies by whole-
abortion?"                                                         
 
An incessant drumbeat of propaganda, political pressure, indoctrin-
ation  of our youth,  legal actions,  intimidation,  and misguided,
ignorant judicial decisions, have so twisted and manipulated public
opinion  on  this issue,  throughout,  and at  all  levels,  of our
society,  that,  incredibly , many people still fail to see what is
overwhelmingly obvious - that it was what the abortionist was doing
that was wrong - not what Paul Hill did to the abortionist!        
 
Even the people  who are supposed to  be leading  the opposition to
abortion have been pummeled into psychologically safe positions and
molded by the societal pressures brought to bear around them.      
 
In the past  I've been  a supporter  of the  death penalty  -  as a
deterrent to crime. More lately, that position has slipped to being
absolutely certain  you have the right person - after a long series
of cases where DNA evidence has been used to overturn previous con-
victions.  Now we have a case where we know they had the right man,
but  they gave him  the wrong penalty.  I'm not going to say  there
shouldn't have been some penalty, to deter people from breaking the
law.  But this was basically a political execution - for not acqui-
escing to the "lemming-like group-think" on abortion, and a sacrif-
ice to the political pressure and dilemma created.  I can no longer
support the death penalty,  after seeing it so grossly misused.  In
the fashion  of Jesus Christ's Crucifixion,  he was put to death by
people more ignorant and less righteous than he.  If our government
can choose not to enforce our immigration laws, our codified elect-
ion laws,  the child predator laws  in 50 states,  and our homicide
laws, then they didn't have to kill Paul Hill. Now what we need, is
a  change in the law,  and to  put  the abortionists  on trial in a
 Nuremberg fashion. And not just the abortion doctors; but also those
that conspired  with them  to run  this  highly profitable abortion
racket.  Then we can sit back, and watch the judges and juries, all
over this country,  decide their fate.  And,  if the  death penalty
hasn't yet been rescinded, then they are certainly deserving of it.
After all,  since  we're a nation of laws,  we're supposed to  kill
through the courts.                                                
 
This is not unprecedented.  In Germany,  in the 1940s, it was legal
 to murder Jews, Gypsies, the handicap, the depressed, and on and on.
This didn't make it any less murder.  When the  National Socialists
(Nazis)  were defeated in World War II,  the people who perpetrated
these  crimes against humanity  were put on trial and convicted and
punished for their crimes at the Nuremberg Trials.                 
 
It appears that even the FBI is still confused  on this issue,  and
has to take some of the blame for this situation. And I'm not exag-
gerating.  It's all in how you look at it; and they've let the pro-
abortion people twist their perception of it.  You can't change the
reality of homicide with legislation and court decisions.  Just en-
force the laws on homicide.  In the final analysis, this is how the
tenure of these individuals will ultimately be judged: "And you did
nothing?"                                                          
 
Because  what we have here  are serial killers  who  just happen to
have what seems to be infinite legal resources, and extraordinarily
deep pockets  from the crimes they commit.  Unlike organized crime,
which gets rich  by doing things  that are outlawed;  like  running
liquor during prohibition or drugs today;  they have gotten rich by
 changing the law and doing something that decent, intelligent people
won't do  because they realize  it's murder;  even though  it's not
outlawed.  This means, that to put an end to it, about the only way
we have  to match  their funding  is through the Attorney General's
office - unless we're going to wait years for our courts and Congr-
essional "representatives", who are being paid off through campaign
contributions, to catch up with their constituencies.              
 
So what the FBI should do  is conduct simultaneous raids all across
the country collecting body parts, etc., as evidence, and shut down
the abortion business  nationwide,  thereby  eventually choking off
the flow of financial support to the industry's legal and political
activities. It won't even take any forensic experts to identify the
body parts  as being human;  especially from those slaughter houses
specializing in late term abortions.  Think real - not this imagin-
ary world abortionists and our courts are fabricating for us.      
 
The fact is  the  pro-life movement  missed  an opportunity  by not
showing  the courage  of their  convictions.  Had  they  all gotten
behind Paul, and won a complete pardon for him, which wouldn't have
been  a complete  impossibility  with the Bushes - at some point - 
there would  be abortionists  closing up shop all over the country.
Just putting up a strong, unified, fight, would have been unnerving
to the abortion industry; and helped open the eyes of others to the
reasoned pro-life view of the matter.  But, there's still a way for
them to show some backbone,  instead of being gutless equivocators.
A way  for them to at least partly  redeem themselves.  They can go
talk to James Kopp - instead of treating him like a pariah. If Paul
died for the cause, the least we can do is to continue his fight.  
 
"Paul  was allowed  to choose  an organization  to interview him on
camera the day before he was to die. Paul chose Life Dynamics."    
 
"During his  'trial,'  the judge silenced Paul  by denying him  the
chance  to present his theory of defense:  the lawful use of deadly
force to  defend  another.  Paul was not allowed  to show the court
what he truly believed - that his actions were necessary to prevent
mass murder. At the conclusion of the government's show trial, Paul
was found guilty of murder...".                                    
 
"Paul  seemed very much  at peace.  He was composed and calm and no
anger or bitterness  was evident in him.  He smiled frequently  and
laughed easily... For the last time, he and his family had a couple
of hours together."                                                
 
"The sky over the prison began to grow dark,  very much like it was
scripted in an Old Testament movie.  A rainbow appeared  right over
the prison, then  disappeared.  As 6 o'clock approached, lightening
began to strike  all around  the prison.  One lightening strike hit
the ground about 50 yards from the media satellite trucks,  causing
dirt to fly up into the air. A news crewman said, 'that's a warning
 shot.' Regardless of people's belief in God, everyone present seemed
to have a sense that something very out of the ordinary was happen-
ing,  and people were  very rattled by it.  The media organizations
 were unable to go live as they had hoped to do at the time of Paul's
execution.  Right at 6 o'clock,  lightening struck  just behind the
 death house. At that moment, the lights flickered inside the execut-
ion chamber..."                                                    
 
"Outside, people prayed out loud, some wept, some sang, and a bugle
played taps over the backdrop of the thunder and crackling lighten-
ing.  The prison guards...lowered their heads respectfully  as Paul
passed  from this world.  Thunder gave way to a soft rain,  and the
 hearse pulled away from the prison." Life Dynamics News October 2003
 
"His last words were a call to arms for abortion opponents. 'If you
believe abortion is a lethal force, you should oppose the force and
do what you have to do to stop it.  May God help you to protect the
unborn  as you would want to be protected.'  Hill's final statement
was prefaced  by a  thunderclap outside,  which echoed  just as the
 curtain in the glass-plated death chamber parted. Outside the razor-
 wired prison...a crowd of about 80 abortion opponents and anti-death
 penalty advocates gathered...enduring drenching thunderstorms...Gov.
Jeb Bush  on Wednesday  denied  last-minute appeals  from those who
urged that Hill's sentence  be commuted to life."  John Kennedy and
Bob Mahlburg, Orlando Sentinel.                                    
 
From the thunder,  one could speculate  that I wasn't  the only one
angry.                                                             
 
 You can't call it justice or a fair trial when he wasn't even allow-
 ed to defend himself. It's also interesting to note that the Florida
 court system that sent Paul to his death is the same one that killed
Terri Schiavo! Justice would be throwing these judges in jail - not
acquiescing to their decisions.                                    
 
Paul Hill,  a Presbyterian minister,  believed  that he would go to
heaven, and find his reward there.  Not being knowledgeable in that
area,  I suppose I should defer to his expertise.  If so, I imagine
him there now, with a tiny hand in each of his, and all around him,
as far as the eye can see,  a sea of innocents,  a sea of humanity,
with Paul at its center.  If not in this world,  he will have found
love, and justification, in that one  - as Saint Paul.             
 
As for  this one,  I think  that  Conrad Wojnar,  one of  the  most
religious people I know  -  and certainly not a wimp;  expressed it
best  when  he said  "martyrdom - true martyrdom - is  the complete
 giving of self for higher ideals. While we may think of true martyrs
 in terms of long-dead saints, we'd be wrong to overlook the examples
of  genuine martyrdom  today."  Certainly,  the Roman Empire didn't
initially see Jesus as a martyr either.                            
 
 "mar·tyr (mär“t…r) n. 1. One who chooses to suffer death rather than
renounce religious principles. 2. One who makes great sacrifices or
 suffers much in order to further a belief, cause, or principle." The
American Heritage Dictionary.  So,  we  see  that  Paul Hill,  has,
indeed, attained martyrdom for the pro-life cause.                 
 
Perhaps,  someday,  we can build a monument to Paul Hill, and place
it in one of the cemeteries for the unborn. Or a statue, and put it
outside the Supreme Court building, facing the Washington Monument,
as if beckoning to the pro-life marchers on January 22nd.          
 
As a  fellow soldier  in the army  of the unborn,  I pledge to you,
Paul,  that  I  will  continue  to work  on things  from  this end,
believing that I can do more good here,  alive,  speaking for those
 who can not speak for themselves, than making the ultimate sacrifice
as you did.  After all,  you already did that,  and I think  one is
probably enough.  I didn't get into this  to do what others had al-
ready done, or to be told what to think or do,  and I will continue
to try to make a unique contribution,  to free our country from the
imprisoning thought of political correctness and abortion for all. 

Well done, Paul. Rest In Peace, Paul Hill.                         
 
Intecon                                                            



Book Image
ABORTION
PROS
and
CONS
732 pages of insight into the most vital issue of our time.
www.bookonabortion.com


Return to Book Page